
| Welcome. This crash course will help you
evaluate product test information. It will also help you make some sense of medical
journal articles and abstracts. If you have the title of a medical journal article, you
can get the whole article. Also, you can search the name of a product, herb or
chemical ingredient to see if there are any journal articles written about it. It's
easy. Use the National Library
of Medicine. Tests done on humans are called clinical trials. People in the tests are called subjects. Some tests are better than others. The better tests tell you more about what a product can do for you. Below are some tough questions to ask when reviewing clinical literature. Who was it tested on? Be
sure test subjects represent you. Men and women often respond differently to treatment. So
do the young and the old. Also, about 5% of hair loss is due to rare and often
temporary conditions. Studies done on people in this 5% tell you nothing about
androgenetic alopecia, 95% of all hair loss. Don't be surprised, though, if test subjects
have lesser degrees of hair loss. More can be done for dying follicles than dead
ones. Where exactly does it work? Some
products work only in specific areas of the scalp. If you're thin up front, for
example, you may not care about a product that works only in the back. What was measured? Hair
count and controlled photography are the best ways to measure effectiveness. They should
be done at regular intervals by the researcher and not by wishful test subjects. Hair
count should be a census in a precisely located, measured area. Be wary of less meaningful
measurements like hairs in the comb or shower strainer. After all, "40% less
hair loss" doesn't mean that a product will make you look like Elvis. Also, look
for shifty photographic techniques. Photos should be consistent, with identical
camera settings, lighting, angle, distance, hair length and styling. How long was the test? The
longer the better. Hair grows and sheds in natural cycles. These cycles could be
mistakenly attributed to a test product in the short term. Also, over time side
effects may emerge or a product may lose effectiveness. A test conducted over a year
is certainly better that one done in a few months. How many people were studied? The
more the merrier. Five hundred is better than five. The number of people studied is
the sample size. The sample represents the population. A large enough sample is
needed to give results that those of us in the population can count on.
Has the study been published? Publication in a medical journal gives you some assurance of study quality. Scientific journals have standards. The most prestigious journals require every detail from every aspect of the study. They open up a study for peer review. Other scientists and researchers can pore over the details of a study and rip it to shreds if something doesn't look right. This is important, because it helps keep research accurate and honest. Most research- good and bad -doesn't get published, but published is better. Industrial Strength Reading: An Introduction to Clinical Research
|
Home page.